300 Norma Mag a€“ Ballistics and quality review, 300…

Ita€™s not different from claiming, a€?Hey people, leta€™s give up the 300 gain mag for that 6.5 creed in regards to our sniper program. Lol

Staying a person and use the recoil or put-on their wifea€™s muzzle rest. Should you decide dona€™t can control the recoil, you almost certainly should have the gun your own recording.

Could I estimate you in the foreseeable future ? I like the a€?be a mana€? character and also the a€?put on the wifea€™s muzzle brakea€?.

Sorry to nullify your statistics however it’s essential to supply accuracy whenever discussing ballistics as well as address this art with specific amounts. Not simply exactly what has a tendency to bring the present day biased quality.

The 300 Norma Magnum with a 220 grains round chance at 3000 feet per other at sea level remains supersonic to 1950 lawns. To not ever 1500 yards whenever declare inside information.

The 338 Lapua with a 270 cereal bullet (b.c. 0.757) at 2900 legs per next at sea level (how many times would pictures come about at sea-level in high altitude of Afghanistan, I wondera€¦) stays supersonic to 1925 gardens.

This can bena€™t evaluate and that is best or which can be even more practical to support but quite simply to give PRECISE help and advice.

When you compare the efficacy of projectiles in various calibers that you do not pit designs at whim. We contrast bullets that share equivalent version factor. a€?form factora€? are misused always in numerous written material as which means ergonomica€¦This will never be exactly what version aspect try. This means comparing a 230 grain round in .30 quality because create inside your example, that you do not do a comparison of that round to a 250 cereals bullet in .338 grade nevertheless, you evaluate they to a bullet that stocks an identical sectional densitya€¦Ballistics 101.. Read more “300 Norma Mag a€“ Ballistics and quality review, 300 Norma Mag Background” →